The debate surrounding Liverpool's refereeing decisions is one that has been ongoing for some time now. The club has faced criticism over the years for their perceived use of questionable tactics to manipulate the outcome of games.

One example of this occurred in the 2018 FA Cup Final against Chelsea. Liverpool had a late equalizer through Jordan Henderson, but the goal was controversially disallowed due to a handball by Virgil van Dijk. The incident sparked outrage from fans and media alike, with many claiming it was a deliberate act to secure victory for the Reds.

Another example came during the 2019 Premier League season, when Liverpool were awarded a penalty kick despite being offside. The decision was met with widespread condemnation, with former player Jamie Redknapp stating that "it's a joke" and that "they're getting away with murder."

These incidents have not only led to criticism from fans and media, but they have also resulted in Liverpool losing matches and points. In addition, the club has faced calls for them to be punished by the governing body, such as the Football Association (FA).

However, it is important to note that these controversies do not solely apply to Liverpool. Many other teams across Europe have also faced similar criticisms for their use of tactics to gain an advantage. For example, Manchester City has been accused of using false starts and other tactics to secure victories in recent seasons.

Despite these controversies, football remains a popular sport worldwide, and the game continues to evolve. It will be interesting to see how referees continue to be involved in the decision-making process going forward, and whether there will be further changes or improvements made to ensure fairness and transparency in the sport.